A de minimis waiver is an official decision by a government agency to relax or set aside rules that would normally apply, but only when the value of the items involved is below a certain threshold. Think of it as a recognition that enforcing strict requirements on very small amounts of goods or costs can cause more harm than good.
The waiver exists to balance efficiency with compliance, letting regulators and businesses focus on higher-value transactions that truly affect trade policy and domestic industries.
As the president of a third-party logistics and foreign trade zone company with more than 35 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how small regulatory shifts ripple through supply chains. The end of the de minimis exemption in 2025 changed the way businesses think about importing goods, particularly for direct-to-consumer e-commerce.
While exemptions allowed shipments under $800 to flow duty-free, waivers offer a different kind of relief. They don’t eliminate the duty outright but create breathing room when compliance costs outweigh the value of the goods.
This matters for our clients because the difference between paying or not paying duties on thousands of shipments each week can make or break margins. A de minimis waiver is not a loophole; it is a practical tool for making trade more efficient without ignoring the laws meant to protect domestic industries.
When I advise clients, I always remind them that waivers are not granted in a vacuum. They come from legal authority and executive direction. The Build America, Buy America Act (BABA) within the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law set out the framework for how domestic preferences apply in federally funded projects.
Agencies like the Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration have since issued guidance on waivers for de minimis costs and small grants. In practice, this means that if the value of non-compliant construction materials is less than $1 million or under 5% of total project costs, a waiver might apply.
For smaller grants—projects funded with less than $500,000 in federal assistance—the waiver could also ease Buy America requirements. These numbers may look bureaucratic, but they translate into real flexibility for companies building infrastructure or sourcing global materials.
Over the years, I’ve sat across from countless business owners worried about the cost of compliance paperwork that feels larger than the cost of the shipment itself. This is where the de minimis waiver plays a critical role.
It reduces unnecessary administrative weight and keeps projects moving. For example, when a manufacturer needs a specific electronic component that isn’t available domestically, the waiver allows them to import that part without getting caught in months of delay.
Another reason businesses turn to waivers is predictability. International trade thrives on certainty, and without relief mechanisms like waivers, companies might hold back investments.
By knowing that smaller-value imports won’t derail a project, managers can better plan their cash flow and timelines. This is especially true for industries with fast production cycles, such as electronics and apparel, where speed to market is everything.
From what I’ve seen at Tri-Link FTZ, the industries most impacted by these waivers are the ones moving massive volumes of goods at lower values. E-commerce companies rely heavily on small shipments, and the removal of the de minimis exemption has forced them to rethink logistics.
Waivers help cushion that shift, even if only temporarily. Transportation and infrastructure firms also feel the effects.
When a bridge project needs bolts or wires sourced from overseas, waivers can keep construction on track without spiraling into non-compliance. Manufacturers importing specialized parts, retailers sourcing seasonal products, and even pharmaceutical firms shipping critical but low-cost components all benefit from these provisions.
Carriers like FedEx and UPS highlight the broader industry impact. As reported recently, FedEx projected a $170 million financial hit from the end of the de minimis exemption.
While that figure reflects lost exemptions, not waivers, it underscores how sensitive logistics companies are to small shifts in customs treatment. Waivers act as a counterbalance in this new landscape.
One of the biggest advantages of de minimis waivers is their effect on duties and tariffs. Instead of paying duties on every minor component, businesses can use the waiver to focus compliance efforts where they matter most.
This not only saves money but also reduces bottlenecks in customs clearance. Another angle is tariff engineering, where businesses legally design products or adjust supply chains to minimize tariff exposure.
A waiver fits into this playbook by giving companies more flexibility in sourcing. Combined with Foreign Trade Zones like ours, which already allow duty deferral and weekly entry filings, waivers can create a layered compliance strategy that preserves both competitiveness and legality.
Compliance itself becomes easier too. Without a waiver, firms might spend disproportionate resources tracking down the country of origin for a tiny component.
With a waiver, those resources can be directed toward managing higher-value risks. It’s about aligning effort with impact, something I’ve always advised our clients to prioritize.
Whenever I explain the waiver process to clients, I stress that not every waiver is created equal. These decisions are made by specific government agencies that have been granted authority under federal law.
For example, the Department of Transportation and its operating administrations—such as the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Transit Administration, and the Federal Railroad Administration—can all issue waivers under their own statutes. The Build America, Buy America Act created a framework, but the actual power rests in the agencies.
It is important to understand that these waivers are not blanket exemptions. They are carefully crafted under the principle of public interest.
In practice, that means an agency must weigh whether strict application of the rules would cause more harm than good. I’ve witnessed projects where a delay in sourcing a small imported part could have set back an entire highway construction schedule.
In those cases, the waiver authority gives regulators flexibility to keep the economy moving without undermining the intent of domestic sourcing laws. Another layer is the Office of Management and Budget, which issues guidance on how waivers should be structured.
They do not directly approve every case but set the tone for consistency across agencies. For businesses, this means that navigating the waiver process requires not only knowledge of the specific agency but also awareness of broader federal policy.
Over three decades in logistics, I’ve learned that relationships and awareness are as important as the paperwork itself.
The most significant change in recent years was the end of the de minimis exemption in 2025, which shook the foundation of direct-to-consumer trade. Under the exemption, packages valued under $800 entered the United States duty-free.
That system supported more than a billion shipments each year. When the exemption was removed first for China and Hong Kong, and then globally, companies like FedEx and UPS saw immediate drops in volume and revenue.
This is where the de minimis waiver conversation becomes essential. While exemptions are gone, waivers continue to offer a narrow but valuable safety valve.
Recent Department of Transportation notices highlight how agencies apply waivers to specific contexts, such as small grants under $500,000 or material costs under $1 million. These are not loopholes but structured relief mechanisms designed to reduce administrative drag.
Executive Orders have also played a role. President Biden’s E.O. 14005 emphasized maximizing domestic production, while the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law embedded those principles into funding.
At the same time, regulators have recognized the need for targeted waivers to prevent minor costs from stalling billion-dollar projects. As a logistics provider, I view this balancing act as the space where strategy lives.
Businesses that understand both the intent of policy and the details of waiver opportunities are positioned to thrive even under tighter regulations.
No waiver lasts forever, and businesses must treat them as conditional tools. For the de minimis waiver, there are clear boundaries.
The cost thresholds—5% of project material costs or a $1 million cap—are non-negotiable. Small grant projects are capped at $500,000 in federal funding.
Anything beyond those numbers requires full compliance or a separate waiver request. There are also exclusions that catch many companies by surprise.
For instance, certain projects involving iron and steel under FHWA oversight remain subject to stricter rules, regardless of the de minimis waiver. Similarly, product-specific exclusions such as electric vehicle chargers or certain types of vehicles highlight how the government carves out sensitive industries.
Expiration is another factor. Waivers must be reviewed every five years, and agencies reserve the right to shorten or withdraw them if circumstances change.
That means a business strategy built only around today’s waiver might collapse tomorrow. At Tri-Link FTZ, we guide clients to think of waivers as one layer of defense, not the foundation.
Compliance strategies must be resilient enough to survive if a waiver is pulled with little notice.
One of the questions I hear most often is, “How do I actually get one of these waivers?” The process varies by agency, but the fundamentals are consistent.
A company must demonstrate that the cost of the non-compliant goods falls under the threshold and that complying fully would be unreasonable or contrary to public interest. This requires detailed documentation, including invoices, sourcing information, and cost breakdowns.
From my experience, businesses that succeed with waiver requests are those that treat compliance tracking as part of their daily operations, not as a scramble when an issue arises. Keeping clean records of material costs and origins makes it far easier to prove eligibility.
Another smart move is working with customs brokers or compliance consultants who know the nuances of federal requirements. It’s also worth noting that some waivers apply automatically at the program level, while others must be specifically requested.
Understanding the difference can save weeks of confusion. My advice is always to ask early, clarify with the agency, and never assume a waiver applies just because costs seem low.
When in doubt, engage experts like our team at Tri-Link FTZ who handle these issues every day.
Despite the relief waivers can provide, many companies stumble in their application. The most common mistake is poor cost tracking.
If a project fails to clearly separate construction materials from iron and steel, it can unintentionally fall out of compliance. Another frequent error is misunderstanding the aggregation rule.
Multiple small awards for the same project must be added together, and if they cross the $500,000 threshold, the waiver no longer applies. Businesses also sometimes assume that waivers are permanent.
In reality, a waiver may expire, be revised, or be revoked altogether. Ignoring expiration dates or failing to plan for review cycles can leave a project vulnerable.
Some firms also overlook subawards, not realizing that pass-through entities must still apply the waiver rules. The biggest mistake, however, is treating a de minimis waiver as a substitute for broader compliance planning.
Waivers are temporary bridges, not long-term solutions. I’ve seen companies lose competitiveness because they relied too heavily on temporary relief instead of building sustainable strategies through Foreign Trade Zones, bonded warehouses, or tariff engineering. Read more here.
For companies that cannot rely solely on waivers, there are several proven alternatives. One of the most effective is operating within a Foreign Trade Zone (FTZ).
As an FTZ operator for decades, I’ve seen how weekly entry filings and duty deferrals help businesses save far more than a waiver might. FTZs allow firms to store goods duty-free until they enter U.S. commerce, and they provide flexibility to re-export without paying duties at all.
Another option is the use of bonded warehouses, which serve a similar purpose by allowing imports to be stored without duties until they are released for domestic use. While not as robust as an FTZ, bonded warehouses are easier to set up and can be a smart fit for smaller operations.
Businesses can also leverage duty drawback programs, which refund duties on goods that are later exported. This requires careful record-keeping but can return significant cash flow over time.
Finally, tariff engineering remains a valuable strategy. By adjusting sourcing or product design, companies can classify imports under more favorable tariff categories.
It takes expertise, but when done correctly, it is both legal and highly effective. Together, these options demonstrate that while a de minimis waiver is helpful, it is never the only path to compliance relief. Read more here.
The story of the de minimis waiver is one of balance. It represents the government’s attempt to uphold domestic production standards while also recognizing the reality of global trade.
For businesses, it is a tool that provides relief from excessive burdens, but it is not a permanent solution. After 35 years in logistics and FTZ operations, I’ve seen how companies thrive when they treat waivers as part of a layered strategy, not the foundation of their compliance.
The real takeaway is that no single rule change—whether it’s the end of the de minimis exemption in 2025 or the introduction of new waiver limits—should define your supply chain future. Instead, success comes from building flexible systems that can adapt.
That means combining waivers with FTZ advantages, duty drawback, and smart sourcing practices. As regulations evolve, the businesses that will stay competitive are those that understand both the letter and the spirit of these policies.
A de minimis waiver is valuable, but it’s just one piece of the puzzle. If you want to safeguard your operations and grow in a changing market, the time to act is now.
At Tri-Link FTZ, we’re ready to help you navigate these complexities with clarity, strategy, and decades of experience on your side.
Share this article
